Home → Plays → The Merchant of Venice → Context
The Merchant of Venice: Context & Background
Context Profile – At a Glance
- Date Written: Around 1596–1598, in the reign of Elizabeth I.
- Genre: Comedy (a "problem play").
- Primary Source: Giovanni Fiorentino's Italian tale Il Pecorone (1558), with the casket story from the medieval Gesta Romanorum.
- Jews in England: Jews had been expelled in 1290; almost none lived openly in England, yet prejudice was widespread.
- Usury and Money: Venice was Europe's great trading hub, and lending money at interest was both common and controversial.
- The Lopez Affair: The 1594 execution of the Queen's Jewish doctor, Roderigo Lopez, inflamed anti-Jewish feeling.
The Origins: Italian Tales and the Casket Story
Shakespeare stitched the play together from older stories. The central bond plot – a merchant who pledges a pound of his flesh to a moneylender – comes from an Italian tale, the first story of the fourth day in Giovanni Fiorentino's Il Pecorone (1558), which also features a clever lady of Belmont who saves the merchant in court disguised as a lawyer.
The casket test, in which a suitor must choose between gold, silver and lead, comes from a separate medieval source, a collection of moral tales called the Gesta Romanorum. Shakespeare's achievement is to fuse these two inherited plots into one design, so that the romance at Belmont and the deadly bond in Venice illuminate each other, both turning on the gap between outward show and inner worth.
Exam tip: Show how the two source-plots are made to rhyme. The caskets warn against being fooled by gold and surfaces; the bond plot punishes a world that values money and the letter of the law over human mercy. Arguing that Shakespeare deliberately linked the two stories around appearance, worth and justice lifts a source-note into analysis.
Jews in Shakespeare's England and the Lopez Affair
To understand the play's treatment of Shylock, you have to know that Shakespeare's audience had almost no contact with real Jewish people. Jews had been formally expelled from England in 1290, three centuries earlier, and only a tiny, secret community remained. For most playgoers, "the Jew" was not a neighbour but a figure of rumour, folklore and centuries of religious hostility, often imagined as a villain or a usurer.
This prejudice was inflamed in 1594, shortly before the play, by the trial and execution of Roderigo Lopez, a Portuguese physician of Jewish descent who served Queen Elizabeth and was accused, probably falsely, of plotting to poison her. The case stirred up a wave of anti-Jewish feeling. The Merchant of Venice was written into this charged atmosphere, drawing on the ugly stereotype of the Jewish usurer – yet also, strikingly, giving Shylock a voice and a grievance that complicate the cliché.
Exam tip: Set Shylock against his context. His first audiences expected a stock comic villain, the grasping Jew of folklore. Pointing out that Shakespeare gives him reasons, feelings and the famous "Hath not a Jew eyes?" speech – far more humanity than the stereotype required – lets you argue about how far the play follows or resists the prejudice of its time.
Venice, Money and Usury
The setting in Venice is carefully chosen. To Elizabethans, Venice was the supreme city of trade and finance, a cosmopolitan republic whose wealth depended on merchants, ships and credit. Its laws protected commerce and the rights of foreigners doing business there, which is exactly why Shylock can take his bond to court and expect the law to uphold it.
Money-lending sits at the heart of the play, and it was a genuinely contentious issue. Lending money at interest – "usury" – was condemned by traditional Christian teaching, yet it was essential to a trading economy, and in practice it went on everywhere. Jews, barred from many trades, were often pushed into money-lending and then despised for it. The play stages this contradiction in the clash between Antonio, who lends without interest and scorns usurers, and Shylock, who lends at interest and is scorned for doing what the Christian economy quietly relies upon.
Exam tip: Use usury to complicate the moral picture. Antonio condemns Shylock for lending at interest, yet Christian Venice depends on credit and trade to function. Highlighting that hypocrisy – the Christians need the money-lending they despise – gives you a sharp economic angle on the prejudice in the play.
Reading Shylock: Villain, Victim, or Both?
No element of the play has changed more over time than the figure of Shylock. To many in Shakespeare's day he was simply the villain – a cruel, grasping outsider whose defeat was a comic triumph. For much of the play he behaves villainously, sharpening his knife and refusing all mercy as he insists on cutting the flesh from a living man.
Yet Shakespeare also gives him grievances that the play takes seriously: he has been spat on, insulted and robbed of his daughter, and he speaks movingly of his shared humanity with those who despise him. After the horrors of the twentieth century, audiences find it almost impossible to watch his forced conversion and ruin as a happy ending. Modern productions tend to play him as a tragic victim of prejudice as much as a villain, and that shift – from comic butt to wronged human being – is one reason the play remains so fiercely discussed.
Exam tip: Don't flatten Shylock into one thing. The strongest essays hold the villain and the victim together, and notice that how he is read has changed with history, especially after the Holocaust. Showing that the text supports both readings, and asking what that doubleness does to a "comedy", is far more sophisticated than defending or condemning him outright.
Key Takeaways
- Two old stories, fused: The bond plot comes from Il Pecorone, the caskets from the Gesta Romanorum.
- Jews were absent but vilified: Expelled since 1290, they survived in England mainly as a hostile stereotype.
- The Lopez affair stoked hatred: A 1594 treason trial inflamed anti-Jewish feeling just before the play.
- Usury is the hidden subject: Christian Venice depends on the money-lending it condemns in Shylock.
- Shylock has been re-read: Once a comic villain, he is now often played as a tragic victim of prejudice.
The Merchant of Venice Context – Frequently Asked Questions
What were Shakespeare's sources for The Merchant of Venice?
Shakespeare combined at least two older stories. The bond plot – a merchant who borrows from a moneylender and pledges a pound of his own flesh, then is saved in court by a clever disguised woman – comes from an Italian tale in Giovanni Fiorentino's Il Pecorone (1558). Many of the play's key features, including the lady of Belmont who rescues the merchant as a lawyer, are already there.
The casket test, in which suitors choose between gold, silver and lead, comes from a different source, the medieval collection of moral stories known as the Gesta Romanorum. Shakespeare's originality lies in weaving these separate plots into a single play and giving its characters – above all Shylock – a depth and ambiguity entirely absent from the simple tales he borrowed.
How were Jewish people viewed in Shakespeare's England?
With deep and largely unexamined hostility. Jews had been expelled from England in 1290 and were not legally readmitted until the 1650s, so in Shakespeare's day there was no open Jewish community to speak of – only a handful of secret converts. Most English people had never knowingly met a Jew, and their idea of one was shaped entirely by religious prejudice, folklore and old stories that cast Jews as villains and usurers.
This hostility flared in 1594, just before the play, when Roderigo Lopez, a doctor of Jewish descent who served Queen Elizabeth, was accused of plotting to poison her and was executed. The episode whipped up popular anti-Jewish feeling. The Merchant of Venice was written in this climate, and it draws on the stereotype of the vengeful Jewish moneylender – while also, more unusually, giving Shylock arguments and emotions that trouble the very prejudice the play seems to exploit.
What was "usury", and why was money-lending controversial?
"Usury" meant lending money and charging interest on it. Traditional Christian teaching condemned the practice as sinful, on the grounds that money should not be used simply to breed more money. Yet a busy trading economy like Venice's – or London's – could not function without credit, so in practice lending at interest happened constantly, creating an uncomfortable gap between official morality and daily life.
Jews were caught in the middle of this contradiction. Barred from many professions and from owning land in much of Europe, they were frequently driven into money-lending, one of the few livelihoods open to them – and were then despised for doing it. The play dramatises exactly this tension in the contrast between Antonio, who lends without interest and insults Shylock as a usurer, and Shylock, who lends at interest and resents the hypocrisy of men who scorn him yet need his money.
Is The Merchant of Venice anti-Semitic?
It is one of the most debated questions in Shakespeare, and there is no comfortable answer. The play undeniably uses anti-Semitic material: Shylock is a moneylender who seeks a Christian's life, he is mocked and humiliated, and his forced conversion is presented by the Christian characters as mercy. An audience in 1600 may well have enjoyed his defeat as the downfall of a stock villain.
At the same time, the play gives Shylock a humanity that pulls hard against the stereotype, above all in his "Hath not a Jew eyes?" speech, which insists that Jew and Christian share one nature. The critic John Gross, in Shylock: A Legend and its Legacy (1992), traces how the character has been understood very differently across four centuries, hardening into caricature in some eras and softening into tragedy in others. Most modern critics conclude that the play contains anti-Semitism but is not simply an endorsement of it; it exposes Christian cruelty even as it relies on prejudice, and how it lands depends greatly on how it is staged and read.
Why is the play set in Venice?
Venice was the obvious setting for a story about trade, money and law. To Elizabethans it was the model of a rich, cosmopolitan republic, a city built on shipping and finance where merchants from many nations did business and where the law was famous for protecting commerce and contracts. That reputation makes the plot believable: only in such a place would a bond as monstrous as Shylock's be taken to court and seriously upheld.
Venice was also known for containing a Jewish community confined to a walled quarter – the original "ghetto" – which made it a plausible home for a Jewish moneylender at a time when England had no open Jewish population. The city thus let Shakespeare explore questions of money, justice and religious difference in a setting his audience associated with both glittering wealth and moral risk, while keeping them at a safe, foreign distance.