Home → Plays → Richard III → Famous Quotes
Richard III: Famous Quotes
Shakespeare's Richard III opens with the most famous soliloquy in the histories and closes with the most famous cry in them, and between the two it hands its villain the best lines in the play – the asides, the puns, the four-word death sentence, the night of self-interrogation before Bosworth. Around him, the women curse, and every curse comes true. Below is a curated selection of the play's essential quotes, each set beside James Anthony's modern verse translation from Richard III: Shakespeare Retold, with analysis of its meaning, context, and place in the play.
The translations preserve Shakespeare's metre and rhythm: where the original is verse, so is the modern line; where Shakespeare moves into prose (as in the murderers' argument about conscience), the translation follows. Each quote works both as a line-for-line study aid and as a performance text.
Find a quote
Now is the winter of our discontent SOLILOQUY
The play opens on an empty stage and a single man. Richard, Duke of Gloucester, brother to the new King Edward IV, walks on alone and tells the audience exactly what he is.
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that lowered upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
For Edward, son of Duke of York, rules brightly;
And all those sullen clouds that brought us anguish
Have turned to water, buried in the ocean.
The most famous opening in Shakespeare is also the most misquoted. Read on its own, the first line sounds like a complaint; read to the end of the sentence, it is the opposite. The winter of discontent is over, – the wars are won, the house of York rules, and the storm clouds have sunk to the bottom of the sea. Richard is describing a country at peace, and the line that most people quote as gloom is a description of sunshine.
The pun in the second line does the work. Edward is the son of the Duke of York and the sun that has ended the winter (the sun in splendour was Edward's badge), and the modern verse keeps the play on words open by naming him outright. Everything that follows in the speech is a man discovering that peace has no use for him. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in his lectures of 1811–12 on Shakespeare and Milton, put the whole psychology into one sentence: "The inferiority of his person made the hero seek consolation and compensation in the superiority of his intellect." The speech is that compensation being planned aloud.
I am determined to prove a villain SOLILOQUY
Halfway through the opening soliloquy, having listed everything nature denied him, Richard reaches his decision.
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
To keep me occupied within our peacetime,
I am determined that I’ll be a villain,
Destroying this frivolity of peace.
Everything hangs on one word. "Determined" means resolved – Richard has chosen villainy as a career because love is closed to him – and it also means predestined, fixed in advance by some power outside himself. The line lets both meanings stand, and the play never settles which is true. Richard acts as if he chose freely; Margaret's curses and the ghosts of Act 5 suggest the choice was made for him long before he walked on stage.
The logic he offers is a bargain: since I cannot prove a lover, I will prove a villain. Sigmund Freud, in his 1916 essay on The Exceptions, read the speech as a demand for reparation, glossing Richard's argument as: "Life owes me reparation for this, and I will see that I get it." Freud's point was that the audience half-agrees, because everyone privately feels short-changed by nature somewhere, and so we are recruited into Richard's side before he has done anything at all. The modern verse keeps the crucial word: "I am determined that I’ll be a villain".
O, cursed be the hand that made these holes!
Cursed the heart that had the heart to do it!
Cursed the blood that let this blood from hence!
And damn the heart that had the heart to do this!
And damn the blood that made your blood flow from you!
Anne is following the corpse of King Henry VI, her father-in-law, to burial. Richard killed him, and killed her husband, Prince Edward, too. Her curse works outward in a chain – hand, heart, blood – and then goes further than she knows: she wishes on the killer's future wife a life more miserable than her own.
Within the same scene she has accepted Richard's ring. The curse on his wife is therefore a curse on herself, and the play collects the debt in Act 4, when Anne recalls that her own mouth proved the curse and that she has never since enjoyed one hour of quiet sleep in Richard's bed. The modern verse makes the triple pattern hit as hard in plain English: "damn him", "damn the heart", "damn the blood".
Was ever woman in this humour wooed? SOLILOQUY
Anne has gone. Richard, alone with the coffin of the king he murdered, turns to the audience to ask whether anyone has ever seen anything like that.
Was ever woman in this humour won?
I’ll have her, but I will not keep her long.
Has any woman like this been seduced?
I’ll win her over but won’t keep her long.
The question is a boast disguised as astonishment. Richard has just wooed a widow over the body of the father-in-law he killed, with her husband's death also on his hands, and won her in about two hundred lines. He does not claim to have loved her; the third line disposes of her before she has left the stage.
William Hazlitt, in Characters of Shakespear's Plays (1817), thought the scene only works if Richard is played as a performer: he "should woo less as a lover than as an actor." That is what the soliloquy confirms. The scene was a performance, the audience was Richard himself, and this is the review. It is also the moment the play sets its pattern: every triumph of persuasion is followed by a private speech that tells us how little the words meant.
The worm of conscience still begnaw thy soul!
Thy friends suspect for traitors while thou liv’st,
And take deep traitors for thy dearest friends!
And may you start to think your friends are traitors,
And take the cruellest traitors as your friends!
Margaret, the widow of Henry VI, has no business at Edward's court and no power in it, so she does the only thing left to her: she curses everyone in the room. This is the heart of the curse she lays on Richard. "Begnaw" means to gnaw at continually, and the worm of conscience is a medieval image of the guilt that eats a sinner from the inside.
Each line becomes an event. The worm arrives in Act 5, Scene 3, when Richard wakes from the ghosts and cries out against his "coward conscience". Friends taken for traitors and traitors taken for friends describe, exactly, his treatment of Hastings and Buckingham and his blindness about Stanley. Margaret's curses are the play's timetable, and the modern verse keeps the shape of every clause so a reader can tick them off as they land.
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil SOLILOQUY
The court has emptied after Margaret's curses. Richard, who has just been sighing over his brother Clarence's imprisonment in front of everyone, explains the method.
Tell them that God bids us do good for evil:
And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With odd old ends stol’n forth of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.
Say God bids us return good deeds for evil:
And so I hide my truly wicked nature
By quoting random phrases from the Bible;
It makes me look a saint, but I’m the devil.
This is Richard's clearest statement of technique. The rough sinners at court are his tools; he weeps for the wrongs he himself has done; and when challenged, he quotes scripture. The clothing image – naked villainy dressed in scraps of holy writ – tells us that piety is a costume and that he knows exactly how thin it is.
The play stages the costume in Act 3, Scene 7, when Richard appears to the Lord Mayor on a balcony between two clergymen with a prayer-book in his hand, refusing the crown he has arranged to be offered. "Odd old ends" are scraps and leftovers, and the modern verse renders them as "random phrases from the Bible", which is what a modern audience would recognise: the politician's borrowed sanctity. The last line is the one everyone remembers, and it is the play's whole theme of appearance and reality in ten words.
O Lord, methought what pain it was to drown!
What dreadful noise of waters in my ears!
What sights of ugly death within my eyes!
Methoughts I saw a thousand fearful wracks;
A thousand men that fishes gnawed upon;
Wedges of gold, great anchors, heaps of pearl,
Inestimable stones, unvalued jewels,
All scatt’red in the bottom of the sea...
I’d hear the dreadful noise of tumbling water!
My eyes would see the awful sight of death!
I thought I saw a thousand wretched shipwrecks;
A thousand men half eaten by the fish;
Big chunks of gold, large anchors, heaps of pearls,
Diamonds and jewels impossible to value,
All scattered on the bottom of the sea.
Clarence, imprisoned in the Tower on Richard's arrangement, tells the Keeper his dream. He and his brother Gloucester were walking on a ship's deck; Gloucester stumbled and struck him overboard; and this is the drowning. The waters, the wrecks, the men gnawed by fishes and the jewels lodged in dead men's eye-sockets make the most sustained piece of poetry in the play, and it is given to a man who will be dead within the scene.
The dream is a prophecy Clarence cannot read. It tells him precisely who will kill him and he still greets Richard's murderers with the assurance that his brother loves him. It is also a confession: the second half of the dream, not quoted here, sends him to hell to meet the father-in-law he betrayed and the prince he helped to kill in the earlier wars. Guilt, in this play, reaches people first in their sleep – Clarence here, Stanley in Act 3, Richard in Act 5.
It makes a man a coward
Two hired killers are waiting for Clarence to wake up, and one of them has been ambushed by his conscience. This is his description of the thing: a spirit that blushes, that mutinies, that makes a man give back a purse of gold he found by chance. It is comedy, and the murderers' whole debate is in prose, the play's only long stretch of it, so the modern translation runs as prose too.
The joke is the play's argument in miniature. Conscience is described here as a nuisance that ruins a man's livelihood, and the Second Murderer decides to do without it – until the deed is done and he wishes, too late, that he had kept it. Richard makes the same choice in the same words at Bosworth, telling his army that conscience is only a word that cowards use. The murderers are rehearsing their master's fate, and the audience laughs at what it will later watch destroy a king.
Have I a tongue to doom my brother's death?
And shall that tongue give pardon to a slave?
And then order a pardon on a slave?
Edward has just learned that Clarence is dead. He had ordered the execution in anger and countermanded it; Richard tells him the reversal arrived too late. Then Stanley kneels to beg a pardon for a servant who killed a man in a brawl, and the king turns on the whole court with this question.
It is the moment the sick king sees what his reign has been. Nobody spoke for Clarence; nobody reminded Edward of the brother who had fought beside him. The speech is a confession made as an accusation, and the modern verse keeps its shape: the tongue that condemned a brother now being asked to pardon a slave. Edward dies within the scene that follows, and the guilt he names here passes, unacknowledged, to the brother who engineered it.
Woe to that land that's governed by a child!
Three Londoners meet in the street with the news that the king is dead and a boy will succeed him. The Third Citizen answers with a proverb from the book of Ecclesiastes, and it is the ordinary people, not the lords, who see the shape of what is coming.
The scene is a small chorus. The citizens have no power and no names, but they have memories – of Henry VI, another child king, and of the wars that followed – and their fear is proved right within two acts. The modern verse drops the biblical register for a plain Londoner's voice: "It’s awful when a child rules the country!" The line is one of the play's many prophecies, and, like all the others, nobody who hears it can prevent it.
So wise so young, they say do never live long
The young Prince Edward, arriving in London to be crowned, has been talking cleverly about Julius Caesar and the Tower. Richard, his uncle and Protector, answers with a proverb spoken aside – the audience hears it, the boy does not. It is a joke and a sentence of death in the same breath.
Charles Lamb, reviewing a performance in 1802 in the Morning Post, wrote: "This quality of unstrained mirth accompanies Richard, and is a prime feature in his character." This is that mirth at its coldest. The prince asks what his uncle said, and Richard smoothly gives him a different line about fame living long without records. The modern verse keeps the aside as a quoted saying, so the boy's innocent question, which follows at once, still lands.
Like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word
I moralise two meanings in one word.
And like him, I twist meanings of a word.
A second aside in the same exchange, and the most self-aware line Richard speaks. The Vice was the stock villain of the old morality plays: a comic tempter who worked the crowd, joked with them, and wrapped his wickedness in double meanings. Iniquity was one of his names. Richard is telling the audience what kind of stage figure he is.
Bernard Spivack, in Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil (1958), traced Richard's intimacy with the audience and his delight in his own tricks straight back to this tradition. The line also explains the whole play's way with language: one word, two meanings, and a listener who hears only the safe one. "Determined", "grace", "ever", "protector" all work this way. The modern verse names the old plays outright so a reader without the theatrical history still gets the point.
For by his face straight shall you know his heart
Can lesser hide his love or hate than he,
For by his face straight shall you know his heart.
Who shows his feelings any more than him,
For you can know his heart by looking at him.
The council has met to fix the coronation date. Richard has left the room, and Hastings, asked what the Protector is thinking, assures everyone that Richard is the most transparent man alive. He is describing the least transparent man in the play, and he will be dead before the meeting ends.
The irony is total and the play does not hurry it. Hastings has already laughed off Stanley's dream of the boar, sent back word that he fears nothing, and chatted with a priest at the door without guessing why one might be needed. This speech is the last of his mistakes, and Richard re-enters a few lines later to make the arrest. The modern verse keeps the fatal confidence exactly: "you can know his heart by looking at him." Nobody in the play can, and the one man who thinks he can is the next to die for it.
Off with his head!
Off with his head! Now by Saint Paul I swear
I will not dine until I see the same.
Off with his head! And I swear by Saint Paul
I will not eat until I’ve seen his head.
Richard has returned to the council, displayed his withered arm, and blamed it on witchcraft by the queen and Mistress Shore. Hastings, Shore's lover, begins a careful sentence with the word "if", and gets no further. The order is given, and Richard adds that he will not eat until the head is off.
This is the play's most quoted line and its shortest trial. The offence is grammatical: a conditional clause, heard as treason. The speed is the point. Richard has used two acts of soliloquy, charm and scripture to reach a position where four words can end a life, and the scene lets the audience feel what that position is for. Note that the familiar sequel, "So much for Buckingham", is not Shakespeare's; it belongs to Colley Cibber's adaptation of 1700 (see the FAQ below).
O momentary grace of mortal men
Which we more hunt for than the grace of God!
Who builds his hope in air of your good looks
Lives like a drunken sailor on a mast,
Ready with every nod to tumble down
Into the fatal bowels of the deep.
When we should really seek the grace of God!
Those men whose hopes are built on others’ views
Live like a drunken sailor on a mast
Who, with each rock from waves, risks falling in
To drown within the ocean’s fatal grasp.
Hastings, on his way to the block, understands his situation in one image: a man who trusts a great lord's favour is a drunken sailor on a mast, one nod from the sea. "Grace" is a pun – the grace of a patron against the grace of God – and the whole speech is a medieval lesson on the wheel of fortune spoken by a man who has just fallen off it.
What makes it more than a commonplace is the memory that surrounds it. In the lines before, Hastings recalls Stanley's dream of the boar and the stumbling horse on the way to the Tower, and sees that he was warned and refused the warnings. The speech is therefore also a confession: he did not fail to see the signs, he refused them. The modern verse keeps the sailor and the mast, the play's plainest picture of what it is to build a life on a tyrant's smile.
Who is so gross that cannot see this palpable device?
That cannot see this palpable device?
Yet who’s so bold but says he sees it not?
Bad is the world, and all will come to nought,
When such ill dealing must be seen in thought.
That they can’t see this obvious deception?
But who can see this, yet denies he sees it?
Our world is bad, and all will end up broken
If we leave evil we observe unspoken.
A clerk walks on with the official indictment of Hastings, written out in a fair hand, and does the arithmetic aloud. The document took him eleven hours to copy; the draft took as long to prepare; and Hastings was alive, untainted and at liberty five hours ago. The paperwork for the execution was commissioned before the crime it describes.
The Scrivener has no other scene and no name, and this short speech is one of the play's sharpest. Everyone can see the device; no one is bold enough to say so. It is Shakespeare's most direct picture of how a tyranny is administered – not by force alone but by a whole city agreeing not to notice. The modern verse keeps the rhyming couplet at the end, so the bitterness closes with a click.
Play the maid's part: still answer nay, and take it
Buckingham is briefing Richard before the Lord Mayor and citizens arrive at Baynard's Castle to offer him the crown. Richard is to appear between two bishops, book in hand, and refuse; Buckingham will press; Richard will refuse again; and at last he will let himself be persuaded. The maid's part is the whole plan in one line.
The scene that follows is the play's great set piece of political theatre, and this is its stage direction. Buckingham calls the shots as a director would, and Richard performs modesty so well that the Mayor believes it. The comparison to a maid's coyness is Buckingham's own coarseness showing through, and the modern verse lets the crudeness stand. It also marks the height of the partnership: within an act, Buckingham will ask for his reward and be refused in exactly the manner he taught.
So far in blood that sin will pluck on sin
So far in blood that sin will pluck on sin.
Tear-falling pity dwells not in this eye.
In blood, each sin requires another sin.
There’ll be no tears of pity in these eyes.
Richard is king. Buckingham has hesitated over the murder of the princes, and Richard, who cannot tolerate hesitation, has decided to find a cheaper killer. This is the moment he sees his own position clearly: he is so far into blood that each sin drags the next one after it.
The image anticipates Macbeth, who will say he has stepped so far in blood that going back is as tedious as going over. Richard, characteristically, does not mourn the fact; the next line dismisses pity from his eye and the scene moves on to hiring Tyrrel. What the crown has changed is the register: this is an aside spoken while Buckingham waits, not a confidence shared with the audience, and the modern verse keeps the grim commercial logic: "each sin requires another sin."
I am not in the giving vein today
Buckingham has come to claim the earldom of Hereford that Richard promised him when they were plotting together. Richard, brooding on Richmond and an old prophecy, ignores him, talks over him, and finally answers with this. A vein was a mood or a disposition; the line says the shop is shut.
It is the end of the partnership. Buckingham, alone a few lines later, asks himself whether he made Richard king for this, and rides to Brecknock and rebellion. The play has already shown the audience how the two men treat everyone else; this is what it looks like when the method is turned on a partner. The modern verse gives it in the flat modern idiom the moment deserves: "I am not in a giving mood today."
The tyrannous and bloody act is done
The most arch deed of piteous massacre
That ever yet this land was guilty of.
The most abhorrent, wretched massacre
That ever was conducted in this land.
The princes in the Tower are dead, and the audience is told by the man who arranged it. Tyrrel reports that the two men he hired, Dighton and Forrest, wept as they told him what they had done, and that he cannot get the story out of his own mouth without breaking down. The play never shows the murder; this speech is all we get, and it is enough.
The choice to keep the killing offstage and give the account to a subcontractor is a deliberate one. The tenderness of the details – the boys asleep in each other's arms, a prayer-book on their pillow – comes to us filtered through hardened men who could not bear it, which is more damning than any staged violence. Richard enters at the end of the speech and asks only whether the deed is done and where the bodies are buried. The modern verse keeps the formal weight of the opening announcement.
Teach me how to curse mine enemies!
And teach me how to curse mine enemies!
And teach me how to curse my enemies!
In Act 1 Elizabeth was a queen, and Margaret's curses were something that happened to her. By Act 4 her husband is dead, her brother and one son executed, her two younger sons murdered in the Tower, and here she runs after the old woman who cursed her and begs for lessons. It is one of the great reversals in the play, and it happens in two lines.
The request marks the moment the play's women find their weapon. Deprived of everything else, they have language, and Margaret is its master. The modern verse keeps the odd, formal courtesy of the plea ("you master of the curses"), which is what makes it so bleak: Elizabeth is asking for tuition. Her lesson is put to use in the scene that follows, when she out-argues Richard line for line over the hand of her daughter.
Revolving this will teach thee how to curse
Compare dead happiness with living woe;
Think that thy babes were sweeter than they were,
And he that slew them fouler than he is.
Bett’ring thy loss makes the bad causer worse;
Revolving this will teach thee how to curse.
Compare past happiness with current suffering;
Think of your kids as sweeter than they were,
And he that killed them worse than what he is.
By suffering more you’ll make the culprit worse;
And doing this will teach you how to curse.
Margaret's answer to Elizabeth is a recipe. Do not sleep; fast; measure dead happiness against living grief; imagine the murdered children sweeter than they were and their killer worse than he is. Make the loss bigger and the curse will come. It is the play's only lesson in its own dominant art, and it is taught by its only expert.
What Margaret describes is also what she has done to herself for four acts, and the speech has the authority of someone who knows the cost. She leaves the play on this exit, her work done, and the scene she leaves behind is proof that the lesson took: the Duchess of York curses her son, and Elizabeth turns Richard's own oaths against him. The modern verse keeps the method plain enough to follow step by step.
Bloody thou art, bloody will be thy end
Shame serves thy life and doth thy death attend.
And live in shame until your dying breath.
Richard's mother stops him on his way to war, tells him she will never look on his face again, and leaves him with this. A mother's curse was thought the heaviest a person could carry. The Duchess, who has already told us that Richard was a torment from the cradle, makes it a prophecy: bloody in life, bloody in death, shame at both ends.
It is the last and most intimate of the curses Richard collects, and the only one from someone who loved him once. He does not answer it; his mother leaves, and he turns at once to woo the woman whose sons he has killed. The prophecy is exact. At Bosworth he dies fighting on foot, bleeding, and the closing speech of the play is Richmond's, not his. The modern verse keeps the rhymed couplet, so the curse sounds as final as it is.
O coward conscience, how dost thou afflict me! SOLILOQUY
It is the night before Bosworth. The ghosts of eleven of Richard's victims have visited his tent one by one and told him to despair and die. He starts awake, still fighting the dream.
Have mercy, Jesu! Soft, I did but dream.
O coward conscience, how dost thou afflict me!
The lights burn blue. It is now dead midnight.
Cold fearful drops stand on my trembling flesh.
What do I fear? Myself? There’s none else by.
Have mercy, Jesus! Wait…I was just dreaming.
My conscience is a coward! How it hurts me!
The candle’s burning blue; it’s witching hour.
My trembling body’s covered in a cold sweat.
What am I scared of? Me? There’s no one else here.
Richard wakes calling for a horse and bandages, still in the battle he was dreaming, and then hears himself. The line that follows is the play's turning point: the conscience he has dismissed for five acts is named, and the man who told the audience he was determined to prove a villain admits he is afraid of something. The blue-burning candle was a sign of a spirit in the room; the cold sweat is the body confessing what the mind will not.
The last line quoted here starts the strangest passage in the play, in which Richard interrogates himself as if he were two people. Actors have long made this waking the centre of the part, and Colley Cibber's adaptation, which held the stage for over a century, had Richard shake the dream off with a line about being himself again. Shakespeare's version does the opposite: for the first time, Richard is not himself. The modern verse keeps the stammering, self-interrupting rhythm of a man talking himself back into the room.
Richard loves Richard, that is, I am I SOLILOQUY
Still half in the dream, Richard tries to work out what he is afraid of, and finds that the answer is in the tent with him.
Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am.
Then fly. What, from myself? Great reason why –
Lest I revenge. What, myself upon myself?
Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am.
Then run! Run from myself? Why should I do that…
In case I seek revenge? What, from myself?
The lines are a mind splitting in two on stage. Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am. Then run – from myself? The speech is built out of questions that answer themselves and answers that contradict each other, and the grammar breaks down under the strain. For four acts Richard has been the one person in the play who knew exactly who he was. Here he has to ask.
The self-love he asserts in the first line is the point. Richard has always loved Richard, and the ghosts have shown him what that self contains. The result is a stalemate: he cannot fly from himself and he cannot revenge himself on himself. The modern verse keeps the broken, halting form exactly, including the sentence that trails off mid-thought, because the disorder is the meaning.
There is no creature loves me SOLILOQUY
The self-examination reaches its end. Every ghost told Richard to despair, and he does.
And if I die no soul will pity me.
And wherefore should they, since that I myself
Find in myself no pity to myself?
And if I die, no one will pity me.
Why should they pity me, when even I
Cannot find any reason for self-pity?
The word "despair" is not casual. In the theology the play's audience knew, despair was the sin of believing oneself beyond forgiveness, and the ghosts' instruction was a curse, not a wish. When Richard says he shall despair, he is reporting that the curse has landed. The reason he gives is the play's saddest line: no one loves him, and, since he cannot pity himself, why should anyone else?
It is the only moment Richard wants what he told us in Act 1 he could not have, and it lasts a few lines. Ratcliffe enters, and the king who was afraid of shadows sets about being the general again. But the audience has seen the inside of the man, and the bravado of the morning's oration plays against it. The modern verse keeps the turn inward, question by question, that leads to this admission.
Conscience is but a word that cowards use
Devised at first to keep the strong in awe:
Our strong arms be our conscience, swords our law!
At first to keep those stronger men in awe:
Our strength will show we’re right, swords prove our law!
Daylight, and Richard is addressing his army. The man who a few hours earlier cried out against his coward conscience now tells his soldiers that conscience is a word invented to keep strong men in awe. The two speeches sit in the same scene so that the audience can measure one against the other.
The oration is a masterpiece of contempt – Richmond's men are vagabonds and rascals, Brittany's beggars, a milksop leading a rabble – and it works as rhetoric because Richard has always been good at that. What it cannot do is undo the night. The Second Murderer said the same thing about conscience in Act 1, and it did not save him either. The modern verse sets the word in quotation marks, so the sneer is audible.
A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!
And I will stand the hazard of the die.
I think there be six Richmonds in the field;
Five have I slain today in stead of him.
A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!
And I will stand by what the dice reveal;
It seems this battle has six Earls of Richmond;
I’ve slaughtered five, but not the one I want.
A horse! I’d give my kingdom for a horse!
Richard's horse is dead and he is fighting on foot. Catesby tells him to withdraw and offers to find him a mount, and this is the reply: he has staked his life on a single throw and will stand by the result. Richmond has put decoys in his own armour, and Richard has killed five of them looking for the sixth. Then the famous line comes round again.
The line is usually quoted as a cry of desperation, and it is, but not of retreat. Richard wants a horse to go on hunting Richmond, not to escape him, and the gambler's image before it makes that plain. The kingdom he offers is the one he spent five acts acquiring, now worth exactly one horse. The modern verse keeps the dice and the exchange rate, and puts the famous line in the plainest possible English, which is where Richard, at the last, has arrived.
England hath long been mad and scarred herself
The brother blindly shed the brother’s blood,
The father rashly slaughtered his own son,
The son, compelled, been butcher to the sire.
For brothers blindly murdered their own brothers,
And fathers rashly slaughtered their own sons,
And sons have been compelled to kill their fathers.
Richard is dead, the crown has been picked up from the field, and Richmond, soon to be Henry VII, closes the play with a diagnosis. England has been mad and has wounded herself; brother has killed brother, father son, son father. The lines look back past this play to the three parts of Henry VI, and the whole cycle of civil war is summed up in four lines before the cure is announced.
E. M. W. Tillyard, in Shakespeare's History Plays (1944), took this speech as the point of the whole tetralogy, arguing that the main business of the play is to display the working out of God's plan to restore England to prosperity, with Richmond as its instrument. Modern readers have often found Richmond thin beside the man he replaces, and that thinness is arguably deliberate: after Richard, the play wants a king with nothing to say for himself. The modern verse keeps the pattern of the three killings, and the self-harm image in the first line.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most famous quote in Richard III?
"Now is the winter of our discontent" is the line most people know, though usually without the rest of its sentence (see the next question). Close behind it are "A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!" from the last moments of Bosworth, "I am determined to prove a villain" from the opening soliloquy, and the council-chamber "Off with his head!"
Richard has all of these, which is the play's own point: the villain owns the language. The lines with lives of their own outside the theatre also include the aside "So wise so young, they say do never live long.", the murderer's complaint that conscience "makes a man a coward" and Richard's last word on the subject, "Conscience is but a word that cowards use". Each has a card above, with the modern verse translation beside the original.
What does “Now is the winter of our discontent” actually mean?
The opposite of what it sounds like on its own. The sentence runs on: the winter of discontent has been "Made glorious summer by this son of York" – that is, the wars are over, Richard's brother Edward is king, and the country is enjoying peace. The line is a description of good times, and Richard spends the rest of the speech explaining why good times are no use to a man like him.
"Son of York" is a pun on sun of York, Edward's personal badge, and the modern verse names him outright so the sense is clear: "For Edward, son of Duke of York, rules brightly". The line is now used everywhere as a phrase for bad times (a British newspaper attached it to the strikes of 1978–79), which is a tribute to how well the first half of the sentence sounds without the second.
Is “Off with his head! So much for Buckingham” in Shakespeare's Richard III?
Only the first half. "Off with his head!" is Shakespeare's, spoken to Hastings in the council scene (Act 3, Scene 4). "So much for Buckingham" was added by the actor-manager Colley Cibber in his adaptation of 1700, which replaced Shakespeare's text on the English stage for more than a century and a half and left several lines behind that are still mistaken for the original.
Cibber's other famous additions include "Richard's himself again", spoken after the ghosts, and "Conscience avaunt". Laurence Olivier kept some of them in his 1955 film, which is how many people first heard them. None appears on this page, because none is in the play; where the analyses above mention them, it is to mark the difference. Shakespeare's Richard, waking from the ghosts, is not himself again at all – that is the point of the scene.
What does “A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!” mean?
Richard's horse has been killed under him at Bosworth and he is fighting on foot. Catesby urges him to withdraw and offers to find another horse; Richard refuses to leave the field, saying he has "set my life upon a cast" – staked everything on one throw of the dice – and will stand the result. The horse he wants is to carry on hunting Richmond, whose decoys in royal armour he has been killing all morning, not to escape.
So the line is desperate, but it is not cowardly, and the exchange rate is the joke history plays on him: the kingdom he spent five acts winning is now worth one horse. The line appears twice in the file, before and after Catesby's offer, and the card above quotes the second speech in full, ending on the famous words.
What are the great soliloquies in Richard III?
There are four that matter, and the play front-loads three of them. The opening speech (Act 1, Scene 1) sets out the man and the plan; the soliloquy after the wooing of Anne (Act 1, Scene 2), "Was ever woman in this humour wooed?", reviews his first performance; and the speech that closes Act 1, Scene 3 explains the method – scripture on the outside, "my naked villainy" within. All three are carded above.
Then Richard stops confiding. From the moment he is king, the audience is shut out, and the fourth great soliloquy, when it comes, is a different kind of speech: the waking after the ghosts in Act 5, Scene 3, in which he questions himself as if he were two people and reaches the conclusion that no creature loves him. The distance between the first soliloquy and the last is the play's whole arc, and three cards above cover the last one in stages.
Why is Queen Margaret in the play, and what do her curses mean?
Historically she should not be there. Margaret of Anjou, Henry VI's widow, was ransomed to France after the Yorkist victory and died there in 1482, before Richard's reign began. Shakespeare keeps her in England as a ghost of the previous play, walking into Edward's court to curse everyone in it (Act 1, Scene 3) and returning in Act 4 to watch the curses come true and to teach Elizabeth the craft. Samuel Johnson (1765) found parts of the play improbable and others noble; the theatre has always found her indispensable.
Her curses are the play's prophecy machine. She wishes Edward dead, Elizabeth childless and unqueened, Rivers, Hastings and Buckingham betrayed, and Richard gnawed by conscience and unable to sleep, and the plot delivers every item in order. Jan Kott (1964) called this pattern of rise, fall and replacement the Grand Mechanism of history; in Margaret's mouth, the mechanism has a voice. The cards above quote her curse on Richard and her lesson to Elizabeth.
What does Richard mean by “I am determined to prove a villain”?
Two things at once, and the play refuses to choose. "Determined" means resolved: Richard, having decided that he cannot be a lover in peacetime, chooses villainy as an occupation. It also means fixed by fate, settled in advance, and heard that way the line says that his wickedness was decided for him – by nature, which cheated him of feature, or by a providence that needs a scourge before England can be healed.
The play supplies evidence for both. Richard acts, plans and improvises like a free man, and enjoys it; but every curse spoken against him comes true, every dream is accurate, and the ghosts of Act 5 tell him his fate before he fights. Whether Richard makes himself or is made is the question the play's studies of fate and free will turn on, and the quote is where the question is first asked. The modern verse keeps the key word: "I am determined that I’ll be a villain".
Are the modern translations accurate to Shakespeare's verse?
Yes – each modern line is James Anthony's published verse from Richard III: Shakespeare Retold, set line for line beside the original. Where Shakespeare writes in verse, so does the translation, preserving the iambic pentameter and, where the original rhymes, usually the rhyme; where he moves into prose, as in the murderers' argument about conscience in Act 1, Scene 4, the translation follows.
The double meanings survive too: "determined", the sun and son of York, the aside that the young prince half-hears. The quotes above work both as study aids matching the original line by line and as performance texts.